Breaking Down a RAG System: A Practical Intro Inspired by Learning LangChain

A comprehensive guide to understanding and building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems using LangChain. Learn about core components, scaling challenges, and optimization techniques through a practical Airbnb chatbot use case.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have become a popular solution for augmenting large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Thanks to tools like LangChain and LangGraph, spinning up a simple RAG pipeline can be straightforward — especially when your data is small and manageable.

However, as I've learned through building various RAG systems, the real complexity emerges when you need to scale beyond toy examples. In this article, I'll break down the core components of a RAG system, share a practical use case, and explore the challenges and optimizations that become crucial as your system grows.

Understanding the Core Components of RAG

At its heart, a RAG system consists of four essential steps that work together to enhance an LLM's responses with relevant external information:

1. Splitting (Chunking) The first step involves breaking down your source documents into manageable chunks. This is crucial because most embedding models have token limits, and smaller chunks often lead to more precise retrievals.

2. Embedding Each chunk is converted into a vector representation using an embedding model. These embeddings capture the semantic meaning of the text in a high-dimensional space.

3. Indexing The embeddings are stored in a vector database or index, creating a searchable knowledge base that can be queried efficiently.

4. Retrieving When a user asks a question, the system converts the query into an embedding and searches the index for the most semantically similar chunks, which are then used to augment the LLM's response.

A Practical Use Case: The Airbnb Chatbot

Let me illustrate these concepts with a real project I worked on using Vertex AI. The goal was to create a chatbot that could answer guest questions based on a comprehensive 20-page Airbnb welcome guide.

from langchain.document_loaders import PDFLoader
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
from langchain.embeddings import VertexAIEmbeddings
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.llms import VertexAI
 
# Load and split the welcome guide
loader = PDFLoader("airbnb_welcome_guide.pdf")
documents = loader.load()
 
text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
    chunk_size=1000,
    chunk_overlap=200
)
chunks = text_splitter.split_documents(documents)
 
# Create embeddings and vector store
embeddings = VertexAIEmbeddings()
vector_store = FAISS.from_documents(chunks, embeddings)
 
# Set up the RAG chain
llm = VertexAI()
retriever = vector_store.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 3})

This basic setup worked beautifully for handling guest inquiries like "What's the WiFi password?" or "How do I use the coffee machine?" The system could quickly retrieve relevant sections from the welcome guide and provide accurate, contextual responses.

Scaling Challenges: When Simple Becomes Complex

The challenges began when we decided to expand beyond a single document. Suddenly, we were dealing with:

Multiple document formats (PDFs, Word docs, web pages)
Varying document structures (some highly structured, others free-form)
Different content types (instructional text, FAQs, policy documents)
Inconsistent chunk relevance (some retrievals were too broad, others too narrow)

This is where I realized that understanding each component of the RAG pipeline becomes crucial for effective scaling.

Advanced Optimization Techniques

As the system grew more complex, I discovered several optimization techniques that significantly improved retrieval quality:

Query Rewriting Instead of using the user's original query directly, we can rewrite it to be more specific or to generate multiple variations:

def rewrite_query(original_query, llm):
    prompt = f"""
    Rewrite the following query to be more specific and likely to retrieve relevant information:
    Original: {original_query}
    Rewritten:
    """
    return llm.generate(prompt)

Multi-Query Retrieval Generate multiple related queries from a single user question to cast a wider net:

def generate_multiple_queries(query, llm):
    prompt = f"""
    Generate 3 different ways to ask this question:
    {query}
 
    1.
    2.
    3.
    """
    return llm.generate(prompt).split('\n')

RAG-Fusion This technique combines results from multiple query variations and uses reciprocal rank fusion to improve the final ranking of retrieved documents.

Hypothetical Document Embedding (HyDE) Instead of embedding the query directly, we first generate a hypothetical answer and then embed that. This often leads to better semantic matches:

def hyde_retrieval(query, llm, retriever):
    # Generate hypothetical answer
    hypothetical_answer = llm.generate(f"Answer this question: {query}")
 
    # Embed and retrieve using the hypothetical answer
    results = retriever.get_relevant_documents(hypothetical_answer)
    return results

Lessons Learned: The Importance of Pipeline Understanding

Through building and scaling this RAG system, I learned that success depends heavily on understanding each component of your pipeline:

Chunking Strategy Matters: The way you split your documents dramatically affects retrieval quality. Experiment with different chunk sizes and overlap strategies.
Embedding Model Selection: Different embedding models excel at different types of content. Consider domain-specific models for specialized use cases.
Retrieval Tuning: The number of retrieved documents (k) and similarity thresholds need constant tuning based on your specific use case.
Evaluation is Critical: Implement robust evaluation metrics to measure retrieval quality and end-to-end system performance.

Moving Beyond Basic RAG

As RAG systems mature, we're seeing exciting developments that push beyond the basic retrieve-and-generate pattern:

Agentic RAG: Systems that can reason about when and how to retrieve information
Multi-modal RAG: Incorporating images, tables, and other non-text content
Hierarchical Retrieval: Using multiple levels of indexing for better precision and recall
Real-time Learning: Systems that can update their knowledge base from new interactions

Conclusion

Building effective RAG systems is both an art and a science. While tools like LangChain make it easy to get started, creating production-ready systems requires deep understanding of each pipeline component and careful optimization based on your specific use case.

The key is to start simple, measure everything, and iterate based on real user feedback. Whether you're building a customer support chatbot or a research assistant, the principles remain the same: understand your data, optimize your retrieval, and never stop measuring performance.

As the field continues to evolve, I'm excited to see how new techniques and tools will make RAG systems even more powerful and accessible. The foundation we're building today with tools like LangChain is just the beginning of what's possible when we augment AI with the right external knowledge.

Table of Contents